【World, simultaneous, frequent ・ ArtDeclaration】
Terrorism of art
◇ ◇ ◇
No Victim in Terrorism by Art
日本語・英語の切り替えは、左のボタンをクリックしてください。
その他の言語で読みたい方は、Google翻訳をお使いください。
_JPG.jpg)
Poetic Title(Title like Poem)
since ancient times
the great nature has just continued
the laziness of being as it is
and all the while that
human big city continued being caught in the vortex of nature
nevertheless
the human big city swelled so much, for no reason
moreover
it continues to maintain very calmly
a extremely unbalanced balance
give by industrialization yet
in a space of shallow wisdom named artificial
people almost drowning by being filled up
with own tiny intelligence and pieces of arrogant conscience
they still don't stop
mending appearance with smile
and satisfy own pride
by flickering the classy violence named correctness
a space that such adorable human people have been trapped
『now i release this desperately closed space at inside of me』
towards the crack of that blue sky
«Terrorism of Art≫
◇ ◇ ◇
≪Silent Revolution≫
Terrorism of art that is peaceful and open to everyone
It is Terrorism to extinguish Terrorism
When everyone becomes Terrorist of Art
Nobody stops that Terrorism of Peace
※Above picture was drawn as a poster promoting my activity that is a virtually set activity called [Silent Revolution by ART-IN-NO-FAME].:116cm×109cm
[Silent Revolution by ART-IN-NO-FAME]=Meaning [Let’s fill the world with doing art]
It’s a Silent Revolution, a Peaceful Revolution, a Revolution in Full Participation, and a Revolution by ART-IN-NO-FAME.
§The meaning of "terrorism" in this case
Here, the terms "terror" and "terrorism" are used based on a somewhat special definition.
For example, I think many people associate "terrorism" with "violence" or "destruction," but at the moment it is just a "label attached to the surface of terrorism."
Indeed, from the past to the present, "terrorism" has continued to give fear (terror) to the people, but the " Way of being of terrorism" that gives fear (terror) to the people is no longer meaningful.
It can be said that the "era of violent terrorism" is over.
The original "terrorism" is a "protest" against "violence by the power", and I think it should be in the exact opposite position of "violence".
The time has come to definitely dig up the "essence of terrorism".
Since the 9/11 simultaneous terrorist attacks in the United States, terrorism, which occurs frequently worldwide, has already become the "daily life of the present."
In such a situation, creating "terror(fear) on the spot" for the people by "violence" or "destruction" is now becoming that can't call "terrorism".
Even if one person kills himself at the expense of his life, he will be forgotten in just one hour.
Even if a terrorist attack that sacrifices ten people occurs, on the next day, everyone will become not feel "terror" . On the contrary, is it possible to say that "9/11", which cost thousands of people, still retains its meaning as "terror"?
What Now that large-scale terrorism such as "9/11" has become "mere terror of everyday life" rather than "true terrorism", how many victims will need?
What should do to deliver the voice of the protest?
Where should it be delivered?
And to whom to shout?
"Protests" by "violence" and "destruction" will never reach anyone more.
In addition, I think that the general interpretation of "terrorism" at the moment is that "terrorism" occurs from differences in ethnicity, religion, ideology, etc.
But also the meaning of that is getting thinner .
Even if add economy and language to the three of ethnicity, religion, and ideology, it is certain that the meaning of those differences is becoming thinner.
In religions, many religions worldwide acknowledge each other religion, and the same can be said for ethnicity.
Turning to the economy, the "world economy" is already linked completely, and in terms of language, I think that in the coming generations, English will be available in most countries.
I do not intend to affirm these things unconditionally, but it is certain that these are becoming established facts.
And now, given that the world is moving on a global scale, it is inevitable that ideology will be standardized.
Certainly, these differences in position still cause "terrorism" and "conflict", but I think in the long run, they will become that can't be a factor in "terrorism".
Now that such a future has come into view, why is "terrorism" not going away?
Do you think terrorism will soon begin to decrease?
If so, why is the misery of "terrorism" increasing?
Is that it just because an increase in “excellent terrorists”?
No, you should consider that there are other root causes.
In other words, it is because "society" has not become "society for humans".
I want to say clearly, the opponent who should give [terror = shock] is not [someone in human] but [society as system].
"Society" has the [property of using human beings].
It should be said that "human" is operated by "society", rather than "human" controls "society".
I am thinking that giving a “terror (psychological impact)” to [society that has become a system that uses humans] and creating [reverse rotation of society] can be the only “terrorism (protest)” in its present form.
Does [convenience and cleanly maintained current society] really be making "humans" happy?
Despite the dramatic increase in productivity compared to 100 years ago, how many people can say that "humans" have become happy compared to that 100 years ago?
It is definitely rich in material now.
Rather, it maybe should be said that "material prosperity" is surplus.
At least, the present can be said to be a age when humans do not have trouble eating.
But the poor not gone.
Sad events never go away.
There are so many children in this "rich society" who can no longer laugh.
The number of people who die with loneliness that cannot be saved is increasing day by day.
Despite the fact that "present" is "the age of overflowing with materials" ......
Is someone really able to keep out of sight these things?
From the above, I define "new terrorism" as "reversal from destruction to creation" and "reversal from violence to peace".
In other words, this is [Anti-Terrorism by Terrorism].
This is not [violent terrorism] that destroys human life and the city, but a "new type of terrorism" in which "art" releases the human spirits from social restraint and repression.
Yes, this is "terrorism to destroy terrorism".
I think to create a society that contributes to the lives of humans, by not a terrorism that sacrifices towns and people, but by reversing the society that has become a [system that abuses humans], through the participation of more people in art.
In other words, I am aiming to rebuild a "reverse rotation society" by [Terrorism of All Participants] by art.
日本語・英語の切り替えは、左のボタンをクリックしてください。その他の言語で読みたい方は、Google翻訳をお使いください。
§The Idea as [Terrorism of Art]
I will explain the concept of "terrorism of art" a little more specifically.
As mentioned above, [terrorism in me] has already changed, from [terrorism = destruction] to [terrorism = creation], from [violent terrorism] to [peaceful terrorism], and from [terror = fear] to [terror = deep-emotion(psychological impact) ].
That means that the "deep-emotion" created by "art" can be a "terrorism = psychological impact" on "society".
When everyone participates in the art as "Man in Art" and as an "Anonymous", and can feel the joy there even being anonymous, that becomes "Anti Terrorism" and the driving force to give reverse rotation for society.
Here, I clarify that this is neither a dream nor replace of mindset.
Rather than I am saying with just such an idea.
I am saying that "current plastic world" is "too much perfect fiction ".
And this perfectly designed “fictional world of the present” is “the lie as the masterpiece created by contemporary art”, “the art killing art”, and also "the lifeless world” for humans living there.
Originally, "art", which should have played a role in stopping the "modern age" from being covered with "fiction made from plastic", justified the fictional character named "genius" given to art own.
At that time, [the 20th century of Art] continued to strengthen the `` genius legend '' which was already only a `` symbol of new authority '', and eventually turned the "20th century '' into a "perfect fictional era ''.
I think that it must be admitted as a fact.
"Contemporary art" gives a plausible appearance to [The Fictional World in The 20th Century of Art], and made the experimental prototypes look like masterpieces.
And for that, [The 20th Century of Art] had sacrificed "human life."
As a result, [the era of modern fiction], covered with plastic and asphalt, continued to build as a "magnificent trap", and as it grew, the "human life" is still being lost now.
And the only thing that can reverse this "unlimited freedom on fiction" is the "art own" that created it.
By breaking down the "fictional freedom" that was made up to an established concept by [The 20th Century of Art], and giving "terror = deep emotion" to people's hearts, people's spirits are released, and we can get the courage to take a step into true freedom space.
Certainly, in the “true free space”, it will not be possible to obtain the “stimulation and pleasure” that the “twentieth century of art” has provided.
In other words also in "art", it is no longer allowed to rely only "talent" or "individuality", "reputation" or "authority", and "steady work" will be require.
And this is not limited to "art", but will be reflected in everything in humans work.
Originally, "talent" and "individuality" is things that shine only when accompanied by "labor", and despite there is the fact that unpolished stones never shine, nowadays, superstitions as if there were [talents who can easily jump over reality] and [individualities that do not need to be polished] have been spread, and these have already become common sense.
And as a result, many “talents” and “individualities” are trampled down and destroyed on a daily basis.
I want to see no more artists or musicians who were drowned in drugs or alcohol to continue exerting such "special talents and special personalities."
Isn't it almost time, to give them a "way for work hard"?
In here, "freedom" is the opposite of "easy" or "stylish".
On top of that, still choosing such "freedom" is that I consider "the most artistic now"
.
We can no longer rely on the "fictional freedom" created by "The 20th Century of Art".
If we continue to dependent on stimulation and pleasure created by [The 20th Century of Art], in the future, what will be lost will grow in size, and we will only get remnants.
Will be if we continue that "dependence", the human mind will be tattered.
I think "dependence" is such a thing.
And I think that is already happening.
When almost everyone becomes involved in "art" in any of the position of [Man in Art = creator, appreciator, critic] as "an dignified anonymous", the human spirit will released and the "society" will begin to reverse rotation.
If human reverse the current state of society where an industrialized society abuses humans, and could create a flow that could use the productivity gained by the current society for ourselves, couldn't we call it a "new revolution"?
When the “anonymous people” which makes up the majority of the world, participates in this “new revolution” as [Art in No-Fame] and [Terrorist of Art] with dignity, no one stops it.
When everyone be terrorist, there is no victims, and no one stops it.
* The words "reverse" or "Inversion" are used here, but that does not mean simply "change of viewpoint".
On the premise that the present era is an "abnormal era that has reversed", I use the words "reverse" and "inversion", in the sense of returning the unnaturally reversed state to a natural state.