§ “Quietness” creates a “New Type Revolution”
in the plastic world
I consider "revolution" to be "liberation of the soul" and "expulsion of unjust power".
I consider "terrorism" to be "protest against repression" and its "advertisement of activity of it".
I think that "terrorism" is a means of making the public aware that there are those who suffer from repression, but it is not itself an action toward "liberation".
Therefore, if "terrorism" ends as "terrorism", "protests" can be announced to the public, but in reality, "unjust power" will survive.
So that alone, cannot "release" the human soul.
In today's society, there is so much loneliness in the hearts of too many people, it is a fact that cannot be mistaken that there is an increasing need to release the "trapped soul".
I can't believe that there is anyone who will continue to be content with the state of reality of "plastic world" = "a society that has become a machine that abuses humans".
Can we call puting the feet on the head of the oppressed people and taking advantage of the gains there "a rich age" ?
Can we continue to call it "civilization" in the future?
Does it make sense to call it [Homo sapiens = an intelligent person]?
What does it mean to call it "art"?
We can no longer continue to accept the "structural domination" of the "plastic world".
But just advertising to people that there is a protester will not save anyone.
The "time of sacrifice" has passed.
The "time of retaliation" is about to end.
Now, "the time of revolution" to end "terrorism" is coming.
And, there is no other way to push up "terrorism" into "revolution" except "people's participation".
No "leader" is needed.
Because this is a "Silent Revolution" by the "Art in No Fame".
There is no "Power to destroy".
because the other party is not a "human" but a "system named society".
The "quiet emotion of art" releases the restraint and control of the "plastic world", which has become a "system that overuses humans," and gives life and color to it.
In today's society, human beings are overworked by society based on inorganic mechanical civilization and ruthless efficiency.
In other words, it is "a society that wastes the human spirit".
If we can reverse the rotation of such a society that is useless for everyone,and become that humans use the social system to release their own souls and create the richness of their own spirit, surely, I think that this "plastic world" will collapse and the resources that have become scarce will be used most effectively by sharing to between nature and humans.
And when this [quiet revolution by art] = [Silent Revolution] is accomplished everywhere in the world and as quietly with dignity by not "few limited leaders" so-called "famous people" but by "about 7 billion anonymous people", the world will be filled with "art ''.
And the first in history , the "human soul" will be released.
At that time, around the "Man in Art", a "world without winning or losing or competition" was born, and in that "world filled with art", everyone became "anonymous person" and "all the individual" become a "different individual", "the consciousness of the whole"will be lost, and the world will become "a set of individuals".
I am thinking about such a thing.
* What I wrote here is about the "quiet revolution", which is different from "revolution in the past".
So in fact, we don't have to defeat anything or bring down anyone.
However, if as many people as possible become involved in "art", that alone will free each soul and allow them to focus on their "individuality".
As a result, it will be that a society that has used individuals as parts is released to individuals.
In other words, it is a "revolution by inaction (= quietness)".
At first glance, you'll think "desk theory" about this.
Just only, if society is run on the basis of "art", "philosophy", and the "beauty" that emerges, is there still a reason for humans to compete?
At the current gained too much productivity, when human souls remain unreleased, what is restrained by?
『By art?, by philosophy?, by beauty?. 』
Then I accept all that restraint.